From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rush v. Wetzel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 15, 2023
Civil Action 1:21-cv-316 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-cv-316

05-15-2023

JOHN L. RUSH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, and RANDY IRWIN Defendants.


Lenihan Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER ECF NO. 118, 127

Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

This civil action was commenced on November 15, 2021, when Plaintiff John L. Rush filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. ECF No. 1. On January 13, 2022, the Motion was denied as moot as to Plaintiff Rush and all other plaintiffs who likewise moved for in forma pauperis status when the entire filing fee was paid by Plaintiff Mitchell Simpson on January 11, 2022. ECF No. 43. The Complaint was docketed by the Clerk of Court on January 11, 2022. ECF No. 44. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 127), filed on April 12, 2023, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Wetzel, Oberlander and Irwin (ECF 118) be granted. The Magistrate Judge further noted that Plaintiffs' claims for violation of procedural due process concerning an alleged liberty interest, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants in their official capacities for prospective injunctive relief, rather than money damages, remained in the case.

The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections. Objections were due on April 26, 2023. On that day, Plaintiffs filed their objections. ECF No. 128.

After a de novo review of the pleadings, documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and Objections, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 15th day of May 2023, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Wetzel, Oberlander and Irwin (ECF No. 118) IS GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 127) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated April 12, 2023, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Rush v. Wetzel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 15, 2023
Civil Action 1:21-cv-316 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Rush v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. RUSH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, DEREK F. OBERLANDER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 15, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-cv-316 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2023)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Sorber

. Further, “the fact that unvaccinated inmates may choose to remain unvaccinated for various reasons,…