From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUSE v. RUSE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 16, 1977
351 So. 2d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. EE-343.

October 28, 1977. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Alachua County, Benjamin M. Tench, J.

Charles Ruse, Jr., in pro. per.

John E. Futch, Ocala, for appellant.

Richard W. Withers of Becks Becks, Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant seeks reversal of an award of $4,000 as lump sum alimony as ordered in a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage proceeding in which the experienced and able trial judge specifically found "that the husband is able to pay the same". The final judgment here sought to be reversed is fully sustained by this court's opinion in Brown v. Brown, 300 So.2d 719 (Fla.1st DCA 1974) which, unless and until receded from by this court constitutes a binding precedent on the trial court as well as this court. The final judgment appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

MILLS, J., dissents.


I dissent.

I would reverse because Ms. Ruse failed to prove her need for alimony and failed to prove the ability of Mr. Ruse to pay her alimony.

Ms. Ruse's testimony that she did not need alimony was unrebutted. At the time of the final hearing, Ms. Ruse was earning $12,000.00 a year and Mr. Ruse was earning less than $5,000.00 a year.

I would reverse on authority of Hackney v. Hackney, 324 So.2d 179 (Fla.4th DCA 1975).


Summaries of

RUSE v. RUSE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 16, 1977
351 So. 2d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

RUSE v. RUSE

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH RUSE, JR., APPELLANT, v. CHARLENE RUSE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 16, 1977

Citations

351 So. 2d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Cornelius v. Cornelius

The confusion resulting from the Brown rule is evident in a number of recent decisions. For example,…