Rupe v. Cate

2 Citing cases

  1. Deakins v. Pack

    957 F. Supp. 2d 703 (S.D.W. Va. 2013)   Cited 23 times
    Granting summary judgment on the conspiracy claim where plaintiff failed to produce any evidence showing that the defendants conspired to use excessive force and to remain silent

    ( Id.) (citing Rupe v. Cate, 2011 WL 4889211 (E.D.Cal. Oct. 13, 2011) (“Exhibits F and I have been authenticated because they are in Plaintiff's own writings.”))

  2. Palermo v. White

    Civil No. 11-cv-540-SM (D.N.H. Sep. 4, 2012)

    Courts and prisons have recognized paganism as a religion entitled to protection under the First Amendment and RLUIPA. See e.g., Rupe v. Cate, No. CV-08-2454-EFS, 2011 WL 4889211, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011) (recognizing that "Pagan religious practices are religious exercise" under RLUIPA); Floyd v. Leslie, No. 3:09 CV 378, 2009 WL 3060264, at *3 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 23, 2009) (Satanist inmate requesting access to his "Pagan material," who was told by corrections official, "we don't allow that here," stated a § 1983 claim for relief for a violation of his right to practice his religion); Anderson v. Klug, No. 08-C-0248, 2008 WL 1902023, at *2-3 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 25, 2008) (inmate asserting that his pagan religious texts were arbitrarily withheld and destroyed stated claim under First Amendment and RLUIPA for violation of his right to practice his religion). --------