From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runyon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Aug 9, 2021
2:20-cv-3820 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-3820

08-09-2021

Evelyn Runyon, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

On July 22, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in this Social Security case. R&R, ECF No. 19. The R&R recommended reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration and remanding the case to the Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). Id. at 11.

The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the same pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to timely object would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the Undersigned as well as a waiver of the right to appeal a decision by the Undersigned adopting the R&R. Id. at 12. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.

Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED, The Commissioner's finding is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner and ALJ under Sentence Four of § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Runyon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Aug 9, 2021
2:20-cv-3820 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Runyon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Evelyn Runyon, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-3820 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

William H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

, this Court has held that “superficial interaction” is a “well-recognized, work-related limitation.” See…

Sattler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Fenton v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:20-CV-413, 2021 WL 3721212, at *3 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 23, 2021), (ALJ…