From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runkle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 2010
38 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 2010)

Opinion

Case No. SC10-564.

June 9, 2010.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D09-3480, 562002CF004096A.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Runkle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 2010
38 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 2010)
Case details for

Runkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHANE T. RUNKLE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 9, 2010

Citations

38 So. 3d 771 (Fla. 2010)