From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 6, 2012
90 So. 3d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–1314.

2012-06-6

Shane T. RUNKLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562002CF004096A. Shane T. Runkle, Bristol, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562002CF004096A.
Shane T. Runkle, Bristol, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Runkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 6, 2012
90 So. 3d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Runkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shane T. RUNKLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

90 So. 3d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)