From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rukminesh v. Kuhl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2021
No. 21-1076 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2021)

Opinion

No. 21-1076

05-25-2021

MEHTA RUKMINESH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGGIE KUHL, Defendant - Appellee.

Mehta Rukminesh, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mehta Rukminesh, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mehta Rukminesh appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil action and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Kuhl, No. 3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 4 & 7, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Rukminesh v. Kuhl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2021
No. 21-1076 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Rukminesh v. Kuhl

Case Details

Full title:MEHTA RUKMINESH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGGIE KUHL, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 25, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1076 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2021)