Opinion
No. 06-08-00139-CR
Date Submitted: January 5, 2009.
Date Decided: January 8, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court #4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court No. F07-24603-K.
Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice MOSELEY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jessie Ruiz appeals from his conviction in Dallas County for evading arrest. After pleading guilty, the jury assessed his punishment at two years' imprisonment in a state-jail facility. Ruiz presently has five other convictions currently on appeal before this Court. On appeal, Ruiz contends that his appointed counsel's failure to object when the State explained parole law, mentioned plea bargaining, and allegedly interjected new evidence during closing arguments in the punishment phase amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Ruiz's appeal in cause number 06-08-00136-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that ineffective assistance of counsel has not been shown. We affirm the judgment.
The conviction having been in Dallas County, this case was originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals and was then transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 73.001 (Vernon 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Fifth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3.
Ruiz appeals from six convictions. In cause number 06-08-00136-CR, he appeals a conviction for possession of methamphetamine in an amount between four and 200 grams, with intent to deliver, for which he received twenty years' and four months' imprisonment. In cause numbers 06-08-00137-CR and 06-08-00139-CR, he appeals convictions for possession of marihuana in an amount between four ounces and five pounds and possession of less than one gram of cocaine, respectively. In these two cases, Ruiz was sentenced to two years' imprisonment in a state-jail facility, to run concurrently. Ruiz also appeals his conviction in cause number 06-08-00140-CR of possession of methamphetamine in an amount between one and four grams. Ruiz was sentenced in this case to five years' imprisonment, to run concurrently. Finally, in cause number 06-08-00141-CR, Ruiz was convicted of attempting to take a weapon from a police officer, for which he received two years' imprisonment in a state-jail facility, to run concurrently, and was assessed a $2,000.00 fine.