Ruiz v. Osteen

Full title: CARLOS RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OSTEEN, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2013

Case No.: 3:12cv240/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12cv240/MCR/EMT

05-09-2013

CARLOS RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OSTEEN, et al., Defendants.

M. CASEY RODGERS

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 18, 2013 (doc. 153). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (doc. 158). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, the court determines that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 153) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order (doc. 146) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE