From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling Stamping

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1982
86 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

February 25, 1982

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Williams, J.), entered October 1, 1980, is hereby dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the order of April 24, 1981.


Order entered April 24, 1981 (Williams, J.), and order entered September 21, 1981 (Wolin, J.) are modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to require that Interrogatory No. 17 be answered and Interrogatory Nos. 33 through 35 be limited to all medium-duty, five-foot aluminum stepladders manufactured by White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corporation for the years 1969 through 1977, and otherwise affirmed. Defendant-appellant Sears, Roebuck and Company appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, New York County, all relating to interrogatories served by plaintiffs on defendant Sears in connection with an action asserting that plaintiff sustained personal injuries on or about September 19, 1977 when a stepladder upon which he was standing buckled. The stepladder in question, a five-foot aluminum, medium-duty model bearing number 42145 was allegedly purchased at a Sears, Roebuck store and manufactured by defendant White Metal Rolling Stamping Corporation. Appellant objects to the scope of the discovery, claiming that there is no language in the interrogatories limiting the information to the particular type of ladder involved in this case. We agree to the extent indicated.


Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Silverman, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.


Summaries of

Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling Stamping

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1982
86 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling Stamping

Case Details

Full title:PETER RUGGLES et al., Respondents, v. WHITE METAL ROLLING STAMPING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1982

Citations

86 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Valet v. American Motors Incorporated

Defendants object to the ordered disclosure on the grounds that it exceeds plaintiff's request, and that the…

Mendelowitz v. Xerox Corp.

A second request in plaintiff's notice of discovery, number 9, sought "Lists of any claims and lawsuits filed…