From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rugg v. Rugg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-09663.

Decided January 20, 2004.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered February 9, 2001, the defendant former wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marano, J.), dated August 12, 2002, which, inter alia, denied her motion to hold the plaintiff former husband in contempt.

Betty A. Rugg, Baldwin, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Leonard R. Sperber, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: DANIEL F. LUCIANO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant's motion to hold the plaintiff in contempt for failing to effectuate the transfer of one half of the value of his annuity was properly denied. Contempt requires a showing of willfulness ( see Fox v. Fox, 120 A.D.2d 488; Pinto v. Pinto, 120 A.D.2d 337). Since there was no showing that the transfer did not take place due to the willful conduct of the plaintiff, the motion was properly denied.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rugg v. Rugg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Rugg v. Rugg

Case Details

Full title:GARY A. RUGG, respondent, v. BETTY A. RUGG, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 629