From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruffa v. McDaniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2013
2:09-cv-02258-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

2:09-cv-02258-KJD-PAL

01-09-2013

DAVID PHILLIP RUFFA, Petitioner, v. E.K. MCDANIELS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This habeas action comes before the Court on a filing that has been docketed as a district court motion (#35) to appoint counsel.

The motion appears to be captioned for the Court of Appeals, which also was copied with the motion. In all events, it would be more appropriate for the appellate court to address any issues relating to counsel on appeal. This Court accordingly will deny the motion for counsel strictly as a motion for district court consideration and without prejudice to petitioner's pending presentation of the motion to the Court of Appeals.

The Court notes that the notice of appeal appears to be untimely.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion (#35) for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED strictly as a motion for district court consideration and without prejudice to petitioner's pending presentation of the motion to the Court of Appeals.

_________________________

KENT J. DAWSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ruffa v. McDaniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2013
2:09-cv-02258-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Ruffa v. McDaniels

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PHILLIP RUFFA, Petitioner, v. E.K. MCDANIELS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

2:09-cv-02258-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)