From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudin v. Westpark Capital Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 23, 2024
CV 24-03271-DMG(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-03271-DMG(PVCx)

07-23-2024

Madeleine Rudin v. Westpark Capital Group, LLC., et al.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States).

hi the present case, it appeal s that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 31, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above.


Summaries of

Rudin v. Westpark Capital Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 23, 2024
CV 24-03271-DMG(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Rudin v. Westpark Capital Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Madeleine Rudin v. Westpark Capital Group, LLC., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 23, 2024

Citations

CV 24-03271-DMG(PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2024)