From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUDDICK v. NEEL

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 8, 2011
Case No. SC11-1589 (Fla. Dec. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SC11-1589.

December 8, 2011.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D11-2926, 10-CA-3886.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All of petitioner's motions and other requests for relief are also denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RUDDICK v. NEEL

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 8, 2011
Case No. SC11-1589 (Fla. Dec. 8, 2011)
Case details for

RUDDICK v. NEEL

Case Details

Full title:GERMAINE RUDDICK, Petitioner(s) v. C. NEEL, SECRETARY'S REPRESENTATIVE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. SC11-1589 (Fla. Dec. 8, 2011)