From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudder v. Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 23, 2014
No. 11 Civ. 3453 (LTS)(JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2014)

Opinion

No. 11 Civ. 3453 (LTS)(JLC)

06-23-2014

GAVIN RUDDER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN JIMENEZ, Defendant.


ORDER

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's April 7, 2014, Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute be granted. Neither party filed objections to the Report.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2012). In a case such as this one, where neither party files timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court need only determine that the recommendation is not clearly erroneous or contrary to the law. Arista Records LLC v. Doe, 604 F.3d 110, 117 (2d Cir. 2010); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. The Court has carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's thorough Report and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Defendant's motion for dismiss with prejudice is granted.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

This Order resolves docket entry number 56. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

June 23, 2014

__________

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge
Copy mailed to:
Gavin Rudder
1618 N. Gardener Drive
Bay Shore, NY 11706


Summaries of

Rudder v. Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 23, 2014
No. 11 Civ. 3453 (LTS)(JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Rudder v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:GAVIN RUDDER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN JIMENEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 23, 2014

Citations

No. 11 Civ. 3453 (LTS)(JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2014)

Citing Cases

McNair v. Ponte

"[W]hile pro se litigants may in general deserve more lenient treatment than those represented by counsel,…