From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudd-El v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-766-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 13, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-766-JJB-SCR

02-13-2014

WILLIE RUDD-EL (#201309569) v. THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated January 16, 2014 (doc. no. 2) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Willie Rudd-el is treated as a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody and is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Further, insofar as the petitioner included in his petition allegations that could be construed as claims related to his conditions of confinement at the Livingston Parish Detention Center or a facility operated by the Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff, such claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of February, 2014.

__________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Rudd-El v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-766-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Rudd-El v. Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE RUDD-EL (#201309569) v. THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 13, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-766-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Feb. 13, 2014)