From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudaj v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2021
11cv1402 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)

Opinion

04cr1110 (DLC) 11cv1782 (DLC) 11cv1510 (DLC) 11cv1402 (DLC) 11cv1556 (DLC) 20cv4889 (DLC)

03-30-2021

ALEX RUDAJ, NIKOLA DEDAJ, NARDINO COLOTTI, PRENKA IVEZAJ, and ANGELO DIPIETRO, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 29, 2021, The October 19, 2021 petition for § 2255 relief is denied. But since the issues raised by Petitioners are those "that reasonable jurists could debate," Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), a certificate of appealability is granted; accordingly, this case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

March 30, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Rudaj v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2021
11cv1402 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Rudaj v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ALEX RUDAJ, NIKOLA DEDAJ, NARDINO COLOTTI, PRENKA IVEZAJ, and ANGELO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

11cv1402 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)