From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 24, 2022
2:22-cv-02692-RGK-PLA (C.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02692-RGK-PLA

10-24-2022

STEPHANIE RUBIN, AUBREY RUBIN, and DAMIAN TREJO, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER LLC, RASIER-CA LLC and CARLOS IVAN SILVA VELASQUEZ Defendant.


PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [92]

Hon. R. Gary Klasner U.S. District Judge.

Having considered the Plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice and finding good cause therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is closed and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' Settlement Agreement.


Summaries of

Rubin v. Uber Techs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 24, 2022
2:22-cv-02692-RGK-PLA (C.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Rubin v. Uber Techs.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE RUBIN, AUBREY RUBIN, and DAMIAN TREJO, Plaintiffs, v. UBER…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-02692-RGK-PLA (C.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)