R.T. v. Jones

Full title: R.T., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem PENEUILA NUU…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 18, 2015

2:15-cv-00430-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2015)

Opinion

R.T., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem PENEUILA NUU, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent MATAUTU NUU; PENEUILA NUU; MATAUAO NUU; KARISIMASI NUU; K.O., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, DANIEL OJEDA, Plaintiffs, v. ERIC JONES, individually; JOHN GRIFFIN, individually; THOMAS HESLIN, individually; JAMES MANOR, individually, JASON SCHAFFER, individually; and Stockton police officers DOES 1-25, inclusive; Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-00430-GEB-KJN United States District Court, E.D. California. September 18, 2015

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         The Court declines to sign the stipulation and proposed order filed on September 15, 2015, (ECF No. 27), which concerns "an inadvertent clerical error in the answer to plaintiffs' second amended complaint, " since the stipulation does not comply with Local Rule 220, which prescribes in relevant part: "every pleading to which an amendment or supplement is permitted... shall be retyped and filed so that it is complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading."