R.T. v. BW RRI III LLC

Full title: R.T., an individual, Plaintiff, v. BW RRI III LLC d/b/a “RED ROOF INN,…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Sep 1, 2023

2:23-cv-00720-JHC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00720-JHC

09-01-2023

R.T., an individual, Plaintiff, v. BW RRI III LLC d/b/a “RED ROOF INN,” Defendant.

LANE POWELL PC Andrew G. Yates, WSBA No. 34239, TUCKER ELLIS LLP Chelsea Mikula (pro hac vice pending), Sandra J. Wunderlich, pro hac vice pending, Nicholas V. Janizeh, pro hac vice pending Attorneys for Defendant RESTORE THE CHILD, PLLC Susanna L. Southworth, PhD, JD, WSBA #35687 Attorney-at-Law Restore the Child, PLLC DOUGLAS & LONDON PC Randolph Janis(Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

LANE POWELL PC Andrew G. Yates, WSBA No. 34239, TUCKER ELLIS LLP Chelsea Mikula (pro hac vice pending), Sandra J. Wunderlich, pro hac vice pending, Nicholas V. Janizeh, pro hac vice pending Attorneys for Defendant

RESTORE THE CHILD, PLLC Susanna L. Southworth, PhD, JD, WSBA #35687 Attorney-at-Law Restore the Child, PLLC DOUGLAS & LONDON PC Randolph Janis(Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows subject to the Court's approval:

STIPULATION

1. On August 15, 2023, Defendants filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 18) (“Motion”).

2. The parties have conferred regarding the response and reply deadlines for Defendant's Motion and agreed to the following briefing schedule, which will promote efficiency and accommodate the schedules of all counsel:

a. Deadline for Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion: September 11, 2023

b. Deadline for Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion:

September 18, 2023

3. To accommodate the parties' proposed briefing scheduling on Defendant's Motion, Defendants hereby renote the Motion for Friday, September 18, 2023 without oral argument.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion is re-noted for Friday, September 22, 2023 without oral argument;

2. Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion is due by September 11, 2023; and

3. Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion is due by September 18, 2023.