From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RRR, Inc. v. Toggas

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 9, 2009
381 S.C. 490 (S.C. 2009)

Opinion

No. 26612.

Submitted March 4, 2009.

Decided March 9, 2009.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS.

Appeal from Beaufort County; John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge.

David B. Marvel, of Robertson Hollingsworth, of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Otto W. Ferrene, Jr., of Ferrene Associates, of Hilton Head Island, for Respondent.


Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in RRR, Inc. v. Toggas, 378 S.C. 174, 662 S.E.2d 438 (Ct.App. 2008). We grant the petition as to the question of whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the award of punitive damages, dispense with further briefing, and affirm. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied as to petitioners' remaining questions.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial judge's award of punitive damages after a consideration of the factors listed in Gamble v. Stevenson, 305 S.C. 104, 406 S.E.2d 350 (1991), holding there was no error of law amounting to an abuse of the trial judge's discretion.

The Court of Appeals erred by not considering the guideposts discussed in BMW of N. Am., Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 116 S.Ct. 1589, 134 L.Ed.2d 809 (1996). However, after conducting a de novo review and canvassing the facts, we conclude the punitive damages award was reasonable pursuant to Gore. See also Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 549 U.S. 346, 127 S.Ct. 1057, 166 L.Ed.2d 940 (2007); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003) (mandating appellate courts conduct a de novo review of the trial judge's application of the Gore guideposts). We therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals upholding the punitive damages award.

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., WALLER, BEATTY and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur. PLEICONES, J., not participating.


Summaries of

RRR, Inc. v. Toggas

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 9, 2009
381 S.C. 490 (S.C. 2009)
Case details for

RRR, Inc. v. Toggas

Case Details

Full title:RRR, INC. d/b/a Maximum Resort Rentals, Respondent, v. Thomas M. TOGGAS…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 9, 2009

Citations

381 S.C. 490 (S.C. 2009)
674 S.E.2d 170

Citing Cases

McAlhaney v. McElveen

Focusing our review, therefore, on the trial court's decision denying the motion for new trial absolute under…

In re Trustgard Ins. Co.

In RRR, Inc. v. Toggas, this court determined "the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in finding one…