From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rozo v. Carter-Faughtenbery

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 7, 2020
NO. 14-19-00923-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 7, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 14-19-00923-CV

01-07-2020

JUAN C. ROZO, M.D. AND EAST HOUSTON SPECIALISTS, PLLC D/B/A CARDIOLOGY SPECIALISTS OF HOUSTON, Appellants v. CARMEN CARTER-FAUGHTENBERY, Appellee


On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2018-57943

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Juan C. Rozo, M.D. and East Houston Specialists, PLLC d/b/a Cardiology Specialists of Houston petition this court to allow a permissive interlocutory appeal of the trial court's November 1, 2019 amended order denying appellants' motion to dismiss. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d).

After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that appellants have not shown that (1) the November 1, 2019 amended order involves a controlling issue of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion; and (2) an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. See id.

Accordingly, we deny appellant's petition for permissive interlocutory appeal.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.


Summaries of

Rozo v. Carter-Faughtenbery

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 7, 2020
NO. 14-19-00923-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Rozo v. Carter-Faughtenbery

Case Details

Full title:JUAN C. ROZO, M.D. AND EAST HOUSTON SPECIALISTS, PLLC D/B/A CARDIOLOGY…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 7, 2020

Citations

NO. 14-19-00923-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 7, 2020)