From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rozewicz v. Ciminelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Boomer, Green and O'Donnell, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: In the absence of a timely motion made in accordance with CPLR 2214 and accompanied by a proposed pleading as required by CPLR 1014, it was error for Special Term even to entertain the request of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company to intervene in this action (Matter of Colonial Sand Stone Co. v Flacke, 75 A.D.2d 894, 895; Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Drake, 29 A.D.2d 689; Matter of Carriage Hill v Lane, 20 A.D.2d 914; cf. Ryder v Travelers Ins. Co., 37 A.D.2d 797; Sterling Natl. Bank Trust Co. v Ambassador Factors Corp., 86 A.D.2d 547, 548; see, Siegel, N Y Prac § 183, at 222-223). Although we affirm, we address no other issue.


Summaries of

Rozewicz v. Ciminelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Rozewicz v. Ciminelli

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ROZEWICZ, Respondent, v. ALBERT L. CIMINELLI et al., Respondents. NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Tr. v. 21647 LLC

A motion seeking leave to intervene, whether made pursuant to CPLR 1012 or 1013, must include the proposed…

Serdaroglu v. Serdaroglu

The Supreme Court erred in granting the Polleros' motion to intervene. This Court has repeatedly held that…