From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royster v. Lamas

United States Court of Appeals for the Feberal Circuit
Jan 7, 2013
2013-1065 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

2013-1065

01-07-2013

MICHAEL ROYSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF S. WILLIAMS, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, Respondents-Appellees.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in case no. 11-CV-0477, Chief Judge J. Curtis Joyner.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Having received no objection to this court's order dated December 3, 2012,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal and any pending motions are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

_____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s21


Summaries of

Royster v. Lamas

United States Court of Appeals for the Feberal Circuit
Jan 7, 2013
2013-1065 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Royster v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROYSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Feberal Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

2013-1065 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2013)