From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royce Restaurant v. Misty Automatic Indus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1986
123 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 2, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.).


Order dated February 5, 1985 affirmed insofar as reviewed.

The respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Our review of the record indicates that the refusal of the arbitrator to adjourn the arbitration hearing at the request of the appellant was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Matter of Kool Air Sys. [Syosset Institutional Bldrs.], 22 A.D.2d 672), and did not prejudice the rights of the appellant (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]). Moreover, there is no evidence in the record to indicate that the arbitrator's award constituted an award of punitive damages. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Royce Restaurant v. Misty Automatic Indus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1986
123 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Royce Restaurant v. Misty Automatic Indus

Case Details

Full title:ROYCE RESTAURANT CORP., Petitioner, and WILLIAM L. FINGER, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Olidort v. Pewzner

ist., 268 A.D.2d 522, 701 N.Y.S.2d 671 ; see also Matter of Meisels v. Uhr, 79 N.Y.2d 526, 583 N.Y.S.2d 951,…