From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roybal v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
NO. ED CV 10-1829 FMO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 10-1829 FMO

10-13-2011

GARY ROYBAL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Pursuant to the court's Case Management Order, filed on December 8, 2010 ("Court's Order of December 8, 2010"), the parties' Joint Stipulation was due on or about August 11, 2011. It appears from the record that the Joint Stipulation has not been filed as required by the Court's Order of December 8, 2010.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, on or before November 2, 2011, plaintiff shall show cause, if any there be, why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff shall attempt to show such cause in writing by filing a declaration signed under penalty of perjury. In particular, plaintiff's declaration must

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will not be heard unless ordered by the court. Upon the filing of a Response, the Order to Show Cause will stand submitted.

address why the Joint Stipulation has not been filed, even though it was due more than two months ago. If plaintiff contends that defendant is somehow responsible for the failure to file the Joint Stipulation, plaintiff shall explain why he has not filed a motion for sanctions or otherwise brought defendant's failure to comply with the Court's Order of December 8, 2010, to the attention of the court. Failure timely to file such a declaration or to show cause as ordered will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.

Filing of the Joint Stipulation shall be a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. However, absent exceptional circumstances, no extensions will be granted for the filing of the Joint Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Fernando M. Olguin

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Roybal v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2011
NO. ED CV 10-1829 FMO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Roybal v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GARY ROYBAL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

NO. ED CV 10-1829 FMO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)