From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 29, 2009
CIVIL NO. 09-3098, (Criminal No. 08-0001) (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

Summary

dismissing Plaintiff's Section 2254 habeas challenges

Summary of this case from Royal v. Rochford

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 09-3098, (Criminal No. 08-0001).

October 29, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW this 29th day of October, 2009, upon consideration of Hozay Royal's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (paper nos. 53 and 55), the Government's response (paper no. 56), and Royal's reply (paper no. 57), it is ORDERED that:

1. The motion is DENIED.
2. Because there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability, no certificate of appealability will issue.


Summaries of

Royal v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 29, 2009
CIVIL NO. 09-3098, (Criminal No. 08-0001) (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

dismissing Plaintiff's Section 2254 habeas challenges

Summary of this case from Royal v. Rochford
Case details for

Royal v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HOZAY ROYAL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 29, 2009

Citations

CIVIL NO. 09-3098, (Criminal No. 08-0001) (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Royal v. U.S.

Id. In its October 29, 2009 Memorandum Opinion, the court held Royal's sentence reduction claim was…

Royal v. Rochford

as to Plaintiff's line of state appeals); Royal v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58461 (D.N.J. July…