From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Sep 14, 2021
Civil Action 5:19-CV-119-DCB-RPM (S.D. Miss. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:19-CV-119-DCB-RPM

09-14-2021

KATHLEEN ROYAL PLAINTIFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

DAVID C. BRAMLETTE III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Myers' Report and Recommendation (“Report”) [ECF No. 17] concerning Kathleen Royal's (“Plaintiff”) Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration (“Defendant”) that was filed on November 14, 2019 [ECF No. 1]. In his Report, Judge Myers recommended that the Commissioner's decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits be affirmed. [ECF No. 17] at 8. The parties had until August 17 to file objections to the Report. After carefully reviewing the Report, and no objections having been filed, this Court ADOPTS the Report and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's denial of disability and shall dismiss this action with prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Myers' Report [ECF No. 17] is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the action be dismissed with prejudice.

A final dismissing the action will follow in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Sep 14, 2021
Civil Action 5:19-CV-119-DCB-RPM (S.D. Miss. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN ROYAL PLAINTIFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 5:19-CV-119-DCB-RPM (S.D. Miss. Sep. 14, 2021)

Citing Cases

Punch v. Kijakazi

We review the relevant evidence and consider, for example, the nature of the claimant's impairment; the…