From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
May 10, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-CV-55-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. May. 10, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-CV-55-SA-DAS

05-10-2022

APRIL ROYAL PLAINTIFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

SHARION AYCOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 25, 2022, the Plaintiff filed a Complaint [1] appealing the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny her application for Social Security Disability benefits. The Plaintiff filed her Motion [2] to Proceed in forma pauperis that same day. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this case entered a Report and Recommendation [3] on March 31, 2022 in which he found that “[w]hile this family has a modest income the plaintiff is capable to [sic] paying court costs in this action, though she may require some additional time.” [3] at p. 2. As such, the Magistrate Judge recommended that “the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, but that the plaintiff be granted some additional time in which to pay the filing fee.” Id. The Magistrate Judge further noted that the Plaintiff had fourteen (14) days from the date of the Report and Recommendation [3] to file any objections to the same. The Plaintiff has not filed any objections, and the time to do so has passed.

When a party files an objection to a Report and Recommendation, a court must then conduct a de novo review of the sections of the Report to which the party objects. Davis v. Turner, 2018 WL 6172521 at *1 (N.D. Miss. Nov. 26, 2018) (quoting Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (internal citation omitted)). “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Id. (quoting Gauthier, 644 F.Supp.2d at 828 (internal citation omitted)).

Seeing as the Plaintiff did not file an objection in the allotted time to do so, the Court need only conduct a plain error review. Having reviewed the Report [3] and the filings in this case, the Court has found no plain error. As such, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation [3]. The Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to pay the filing fee. Failure to comply with this Order will lead to dismissal of this case without further notice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
May 10, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-CV-55-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. May. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Royal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:APRIL ROYAL PLAINTIFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-CV-55-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. May. 10, 2022)