From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal Neighbors of Am. v. Burgette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 11 CV 2861-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11 CV 2861-JAM-KJN

03-18-2013

ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH BURGETTE and DOES 1-10, Defendants. DEBORAH BURGETTE, Counterclaimant, v. ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA, Counterdefendant.

MANNION & LOWE A Professional Corporation E. GERARD MANNION Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant DEBORAH BURGETTE SNR DENTON US LLP DOUGLAS A. SCULLION ANNA RASSOULI Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA


E. Gerard Mannion (State Bar #77287)
Email: gerry@mannionlowe.com
Wesley M. Lowe (State Bar # 111761)
Email: wes@mannionlowe.com
Demian Oksenendler (State Bar # 233416)
Email: demian@mannionlowe.com
MANNION & LOWE
655 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 733-1050
Facsimile: (415) 434-4810
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
DEBORAH BURGETTE

CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS AND

SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendant and Counterclaimant Deborah Burgette ("Defendant") and Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Royal Neighbors of America ("Plaintiff"), by and through their undersigned counsel hereby enter into this joint stipulation for the modification of the Scheduling Order and a continuance of the trial date, in accordance with Local Rule 143.

The parties have engaged in written discovery, and Ms. Burgette has been deposed. Both sides agree that it is the optimal time to discuss settlement in the hopes of resolving this case before incurring extensive litigation costs on dispositive motions, additional discovery and trial preparation. Towards that end, the parties have agreed to hire Retired Superior Court Judge Ellen Sickles James of JAMS in San Francisco to conduct a full day mediation with the parties in April, 2013.

The parties hereby jointly request that the Court amend its April 20, 2012 Status and Scheduling Order to permit the parties to try to resolve this case through mediation. For good cause shown, the parties respectfully request a modification and continuance of approximately 60 days of the deadlines included in the Court's original Status and Scheduling Order.

The parties stipulate as follows:

1. The trial, originally set for August 26, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. will be set for November 4, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

2. The Pretrial Conference will be held on September 13, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. The joint pretrial statement to be filed on or before September 6, 2013.

3. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before June 26, 2013 and noticed for hearing on July 24, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #6.

4. Non-expert discovery will be cut off on May 10, 2013.

5. Experts will be disclosed by May 17, 2013.

6. Rebuttal/Supplemental Experts will be disclosed by May 31, 2013.

7. Depositions of experts will be completed by June 20, 2013.

8. Mediation shall take place no later than April 30, 2013. Respectfully submitted:

MANNION & LOWE

A Professional Corporation

By: _______________

E. GERARD MANNION

Attorneys for Defendant and

Counterclaimant

DEBORAH BURGETTE

SNR DENTON US LLP

By: _______________

DOUGLAS A. SCULLION

ANNA RASSOULI

Attorneys for Plaintiff and

Counterdefendant

ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Royal Neighbors of Am. v. Burgette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
Case No. 11 CV 2861-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Royal Neighbors of Am. v. Burgette

Case Details

Full title:ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH BURGETTE and DOES 1-10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11 CV 2861-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)