Opinion
04-23-00315-CV
06-13-2023
Michelle ROWLAND, Appellant v. SWAYING OAKS APARTMENTS, Appellee
From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV02142 Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding
ORDER
IRENE RIOS, JUSTICE
This is an appeal in a forcible detainer case. Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment, which awarded possession of the real property to appellee. Included in the clerk's record is the trial court's judgment and a writ of possession. The record includes a constable's return, indicating the writ of possession has been executed and possession delivered to appellee. The record does not show that appellant filed a supersedeas bond to suspend the judgment.
A case becomes moot if, at any stage of the proceedings, a controversy ceases to exist between the parties. See Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006). "When a tenant is no longer in possession of the property and has not superseded the judgment of possession, her appeal is moot unless: (1) she timely and clearly expressed an intent to exercise the right of appeal, and (2) appellate relief is not futile." Stewart v. Fiesta City Realtors, No. 04-17-00839-CV, 2018 WL 4760151, at *1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Oct. 3, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.). "Appellate relief is not futile if the tenant holds and asserts 'a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession' of the property." Id. (emphasis in original) (quoting Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787). Issues independent of possession may be reviewable, even if the issue of possession is moot. See Cavazos v. San Antonio Hous. Auth., No. 04-09-00659-CV, 2010 WL 2772450, at *2 (Tex. App.-San Antonio July 14, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.).
Here, it appears appellant no longer has possession of the real property and it is not apparent from the record whether appellant holds and asserts a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property, or whether there are reviewable issues independent of possession.
Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing, on or before June 28, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f), 44.3. If appellant does not respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court.