From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowland v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 12, 2023
23-cv-02587-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02587-RS (PR)

07-12-2023

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROWLAND, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has not complied with the Clerk's Notices to file a complaint and to either pay the $402 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Clerk's Notices, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; (ii) contain a complaint on this Court's form; and (iii) be accompanied by full payment for the $402 filing fee or a complete IFP application, which includes the application form itself, a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized prison officer, and a prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rowland v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 12, 2023
23-cv-02587-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Rowland v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROWLAND, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02587-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2023)