From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2007
NO. CIV-07-334-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2007)

Opinion

NO. CIV-07-334-HE.

June 25, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner Johnetta Lavonne Rowe, a state prisoner appearing pro se, instituted this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking habeas relief. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred for initial proceedings to Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch, who has recommended that a motion to dismiss filed by the respondent be granted and the petition be dismissed as untimely. The magistrate judge concluded that statutory tolling was not available and that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the one-year limitations period should be equitably tolled.

The petitioner has filed an objection asserting that, because she has been deprived of her constitutional rights, she cannot be denied habeas relief on the basis her petition was untimely. She also refers in her objection to other litigation she has pending in this district.

Having conducted a de novo review, the court concurs with Magistrate Judge Couch that the statutory year to file has expired with respect to the petitioner's claims, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), and that, in the circumstances of this case, the limitations period is not subject to statutory or equitable tolling. Accordingly, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Couch's Report and Recommendation, GRANTS the respondent's motion [Doc. #11] and dismisses the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rowe v. Mullin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2007
NO. CIV-07-334-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Rowe v. Mullin

Case Details

Full title:JOHNETTA LAVONNE ROWE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN MIKE MULLIN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 25, 2007

Citations

NO. CIV-07-334-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 25, 2007)