Rowe v. Copenhaver

Full title: OMAR ROWE, Petitioner, v. PAUL COPENHAVER, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

No. 2:13-cv-0220 AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0220 AC P

02-11-2013

OMAR ROWE, Petitioner, v. PAUL COPENHAVER, Respondent.

ALLISON CLAIRE

ORDER

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his application, petitioner challenges the Bureau of Prisons' computation of his pre-trial and post-sentencing time credits. Petitioner is confined in Merced County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

_______________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE