From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Calogero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 2008
56 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06247.

November 12, 2008.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated September 1, 2006, that the subject building was exempt from rent regulation, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 8, 2007, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

John C. Gray, Jr., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Michael L. Weisberg of counsel), for appellant.

Gary R. Connor, New York, N.Y. (Martin B. Schneider of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal that the subject building was exempt from rent regulation had a rational basis and was not arbitrary or capricious. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the determination ( see Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 § 5 [a]. [5] [L 1974, ch 576, sec 4, § 5, as amended (McKinney's Uncons Laws of NY § 8625 [a] [5])]; Rent Stabilization Code [ 9 NYCRR] § 2520.11 [e]; Matter of Various Tenants of 123 Guernsey St. v New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 19 AD3d 503)


Summaries of

Rowe v. Calogero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 2008
56 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Rowe v. Calogero

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AUDREY ROWE, Appellant, v. JUDITH CALOGERO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8745
866 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

N. Lake Apartments v. N.Y.S. Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

d Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) (see Matter of 85 E. Parkway Corp. v. New York State Div. of Hous.…

N. Lake Apartments v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

Here, the DHCR's determination that a rent overcharge had occurred had a rational basis and was not arbitrary…