Opinion
No. 121768.
December 4, 2002.
AGC: 3564/01
On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court does not find an abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the request for investigation.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rowe v. Attorney Grievance Comm.
Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 4, 2002
655 N.W.2d 558 (Mich. 2002)
Summaries of
Rowe v. Attorney Grievance Comm.
Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 4, 2002
655 N.W.2d 558 (Mich. 2002)
Case details for
Rowe v. Attorney Grievance Comm.
Case Details
Full title:ROBERT M. ROWE, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Respondent
Court:Supreme Court of Michigan
Date published: Dec 4, 2002
Citations
655 N.W.2d 558 (Mich. 2002)