From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roversi v. Converpack, Inc.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jun 16, 2021
320 So. 3d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1420

06-16-2021

Luis ROVERSI, Petitioner, v. CONVERPACK, INC., Respondent.

Barakat + Bossa, PLLC, and Brian Barakat, for petitioner. Damian & Valori LLP, and Peter F. Valori and Amanda L. Fernandez, for respondent.


Barakat + Bossa, PLLC, and Brian Barakat, for petitioner.

Damian & Valori LLP, and Peter F. Valori and Amanda L. Fernandez, for respondent.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied. See Robins v. Colombo, 253 So. 3d 94, 95-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ("[W]e limit our review to whether the procedural requirements of section 768.72 have been followed. ... Moreover, this court is not permitted to reweigh a trial court's finding of a sufficient evidentiary basis for a punitive damages claim, and such a finding could not be disturbed, or even evaluated on certiorari review.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).


Summaries of

Roversi v. Converpack, Inc.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jun 16, 2021
320 So. 3d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Roversi v. Converpack, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Luis Roversi, Petitioner, v. Converpack, Inc., Respondent.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)