From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Route v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
Case No. CV 12-7350-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-7350-GW(JEMx)

05-06-2013

SHENIQUE ROUTE, Plaintiff, v. MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER TO DISMISS WITH

PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Shenique Routé and Defendant Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

(1) this action shall be dismissed with prejudice; and

(2) the parties agree to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

_____________________

GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Route v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
Case No. CV 12-7350-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Route v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHENIQUE ROUTE, Plaintiff, v. MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 12-7350-GW(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

In re Gerber Probiotic Sales Practices Litig.

The Court should not approve such tactics." (Def.'s Mot. 9) (citing Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. Bacardi U.S.A.,…

Seegert v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.

The Court need not determine Melendres' applicability here because, as clearly demonstrated by Defendant's…