From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouss v. Bardwil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1938
255 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 4, 1938.

Present — Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.


In an action brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law to cancel and discharge of record a restrictive covenant forbidding the use of plaintiffs' property for any purpose except that of single family residences, judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. The language of the covenant, and the surrounding circumstances, justify the conclusion that the restriction was imposed for the protection of the grantor's neighboring residence, and that it ceased to have any effect when the residence was sold to others and replaced by a large apartment building. ( Deeves v. Constable, 87 App. Div. 352.)


Summaries of

Rouss v. Bardwil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1938
255 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Rouss v. Bardwil

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN SWAN ROUSS and CHARLES BROADWAY ROUSS, INC., Respondents, v. GEORGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Congregation Khal Chasidim of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Congregation Beth El of Borough Park

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Although the record supports plaintiff's claim of substantial change in the…

Brown v. Williams

216 App. Div. 135; see opinion at pp. 140-142 of 216 App. Div. 135). Nor were they precluded from enforcing…