From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouse v. Hancock Cnty. Sheriff Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
May 16, 2023
3:23-CV-109-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CV-109-TAV-JEM

05-16-2023

MARTY RAY ROUSE, Petitioner, v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Respondent.


JUDGMENT ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Petitioner's federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all pending motions are DENIED. A certificate of appealability from this decision is DENIED.

Further, because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Petitioner file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE the file.


Summaries of

Rouse v. Hancock Cnty. Sheriff Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
May 16, 2023
3:23-CV-109-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Rouse v. Hancock Cnty. Sheriff Dep't

Case Details

Full title:MARTY RAY ROUSE, Petitioner, v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

3:23-CV-109-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. May. 16, 2023)