From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roudabush v. Mosley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2018
No. 18-6804 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6804

08-28-2018

JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. B. MOSLEY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (8:18-cv-01378-BHH) Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court's June 20, 2018, order dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) for failure to comply with its prior order directing that he file his action on a standard form and either pay the filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Having determined that the June 20 order is appealable, see Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015), we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Mosley, No. 8:18-cv-01378-BHH (D.S.C. June 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Roudabush v. Mosley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2018
No. 18-6804 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Roudabush v. Mosley

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. B. MOSLEY, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 28, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6804 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)

Citing Cases

Williams v. South Carolina

Petitioner was specifically warned that his case would be subject to dismissal for failure to comply. See…

Sullivan v. Barnes

Petitioner was specifically warned that his case would be subject to dismissal for failure to comply. See…