From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1947
188 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)

Opinion

January 9, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WHALEN, J.

George J. Stacy and Frank B. Gass for appellant.

Robert Levine and Frederick E.M. Ballon for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff was admittedly indebted to defendant for unpaid rent and it had the right to retain possession of any property stored with it until the debt was paid (Lien Law, § 181). Plaintiff not having paid the same was, therefore, not entitled to immediate possession. Such payment was a condition precedent to making out a cause of action in conversion ( Jackson v. Appleton, 50 Hun 604, opinion in 2 N.Y.S. 787). Moreover, the mere loss of the property does not constitute a tortious conversion ( Salt Springs National Bank v. Wheeler, 48 N.Y. 492, 495; Magnin v. Dinsmore, 70 N.Y. 410, 417).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and EDER, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1947
188 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
Case details for

Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza

Case Details

Full title:AL ROTH, Respondent, v. HOTEL RIVERSIDE PLAZA, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1947

Citations

188 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
67 N.Y.S.2d 518

Citing Cases

United States v. West

Possession on or about March 23, as charged in the indictment, does not give appellant standing to challenge…

United States v. Cowan

Possession on or about March 23, as charged in the indictment, does not give appellant standing to challenge…