From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Fifth Third Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
Case No. 12-2128 (C.D. Ill. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-2128

07-30-2012

WANDA J. ROTH, Plaintiff, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On June 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Report and Recommendation (#2) in this case. Judge Bernthal recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) be dismissed without prejudice and the case be terminated. Plaintiff did not file an objection to Judge Bernthal's Recommendation within fourteen days after being served with a copy, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), therefore Plaintiff has waived any objection to this dismissal on appeal. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). This court has carefully reviewed Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#2). Following this careful and thorough review, this court agrees with and accepts Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#2).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (#2) is accepted by this court.
(2) Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
(3) This case is terminated.

______________________

MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roth v. Fifth Third Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
Case No. 12-2128 (C.D. Ill. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Roth v. Fifth Third Bank

Case Details

Full title:WANDA J. ROTH, Plaintiff, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-2128 (C.D. Ill. Jul. 30, 2012)