Opinion
June 29, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The jury's verdict, which found that the defendants were negligent, but that their negligence was not a proximate cause of the damages alleged, is not inconsistent and is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Keegan v. Prout, 215 A.D.2d 629; see also, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134).
The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.
Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.