From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Cronin

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 155887 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155887

10-31-2017

SHERYL LYNN ROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SABRINA CRONIN and THE CRONIN LAW FIRM, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 329018
Oakland CC: 2014-139283-NM

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Roth v. Cronin

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 155887 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Roth v. Cronin

Case Details

Full title:SHERYL LYNN ROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SABRINA CRONIN and THE CRONIN…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

SC: 155887 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)