From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rossman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, L.L.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1425.

June 26, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered April 11, 2006, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Arnold E. DiJoseph, New York, for appellant.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for RCPI Landmark Properties, L.L.C. and Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P., respondents.

Gordon Silber, P.C., New York (Jon D. Lichtenstein of counsel), for Restaurant Associates Corp., Compass Group USA, Inc. and Raroc, Inc., respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and Malone, JJ.


Plaintiff claims that she was caused to fall and suffer injuries when, while skating at the Rockefeller Center skating rink, she struck a bump on the ice. She testified that when she first started skating, the surface of the ice was "smooth," but that, after skating for approximately an hour and a half, some 15 minutes before her fall, she observed that the skating surface was deteriorating, and there were ice chips, bumps, and wet spots on the ice. She nonetheless continued to skate until her fall. Under these circumstances plaintiff assumed the complained-of risk posed by the condition of the ice ( see Saravia v Makkos of Brooklyn, 264 AD2d 576); the ice was "as safe as it appeared to [be]" ( Nunez v Recreation Rooms Settlement, 229 AD2d 359, 360).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Rossman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, L.L.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Rossman v. RCPI Landmark Properties, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:Jo ROSSMAN, Appellant, v. RCPI LANDMARK PROPERTIES, L.L.C., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5557
838 N.Y.S.2d 70

Citing Cases

Wyzykowski v. State

His opinion in this regard, accordingly, has no probative value (Di Sanza v City of New York, 11 NY3d 766…

Wyzykowski v. State

Although the risk of falling while ice skating is " inherent in and arise[s] out of the nature of the sport…