From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rossi v. Whirlpool Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00125-TLN-JFM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-00125-TLN-JFM

04-16-2013

KYLE DEI ROSSI and MARK LINTHICUM, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant.

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) Sarah N. Westcot (State Bar No. 264916) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Galen D. Bellamy (State Bar No. 231792) Attorneys for Defendants


BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Sarah N. Westcot (State Bar No. 264916)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 300-4455
Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
Email: ltfisher@bursor.com

swestcot@bursor.com
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 989-9113
Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
Email: scott@bursor.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(additional counsel listed on signature page)

Hon. Troy L. Nunley


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

FILE AND RESPOND TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint ("Complaint") against Defendant Whirlpool Corporation ("Whirlpool") on September 25, 2012. Dkt. No. 56. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) and 12(b)(6) on October 15, 2012. Dkt. No. 59. On March 28, 2013, Judge Mendez issued an order granting Defendant's motion without prejudice. Dkt. No. 67. The Court directed Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint by April 17, 2013, and indicated that Defendant's response would be due within 20 days of the filing of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint.

Plaintiffs' counsel conferred with Defendant's counsel on April 11, 2013 regarding an extension of time of Plaintiffs to file their Second Amended Complaint and an extension of time for Defendant to file a responsive pleading. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs shall have an additional 7 days to file their Second Amended Complaint, or until April 24, 2013. The parties also stipulate that Defendant shall have an additional 7 days to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, or until May 21, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A

By: ___________

Sarah N. Westcot

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)

Sarah N. Westcot (State Bar No. 264916)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL LLP

By: ___________

Galen D. Bellamy

Galen D. Bellamy (State Bar No. 231792)

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Hon. Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rossi v. Whirlpool Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00125-TLN-JFM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Rossi v. Whirlpool Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KYLE DEI ROSSI and MARK LINTHICUM, on behalf of themselves and those…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-00125-TLN-JFM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)