From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2015
Case No. CV 14-06715-GHK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-06715-GHK (DTB)

11-29-2015

RODNEY RONDALE ROSS, Plaintiff, v. D. J. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendants Williams, Buechter, Kyriacou, Lett, Mintz, and Varela's Motion to Dismiss is granted and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: 11/29/15

/s/_________

GEORGE H. KING

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ross v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2015
Case No. CV 14-06715-GHK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Ross v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY RONDALE ROSS, Plaintiff, v. D. J. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-06715-GHK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2015)