Opinion
CV312-025
04-26-2012
MARK M. ROSS, Petitioner, v. WALT WELLS, Warden, CI McRae, Respondent.
ORIGINAL
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doc. no. 7). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the petition filed pursuant to § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice based on Petitioner's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and Petitioner's "Motion for Expedited Treatment" (doc. no. 3) is DENIED as MOOT.
Having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's objections, Petitioner's motion for expedited consideration of those objections is accordingly DENIED as MOOT. (Doc. no. 6.)
SO ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE