From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 29, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-586-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-CV-586-B No. 3:08-CR-167-B (3)

03-29-2019

JARVIS DUPREE ROSS, ID # 37467-177, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the movant's successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion will be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997), by separate judgment.

A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal an order transferring a successive habeas petition. See In re Garrett, 633 F. App'x 260, 261 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683 (5th Cir.2015). --------

SIGNED this 29th day of March, 2019.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ross v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 29, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-586-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Ross v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JARVIS DUPREE ROSS, ID # 37467-177, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-CV-586-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2019)